The following case typifies how these and other factors help the patient and treating dentist decide on the best treatment course for a problem tooth.
A 25 yr old female presented with a post-and-core fractured at the bone level on tooth #29 (Fig 1). The crown could no longer be attached, the root canal filling was incomplete, and the adjacent tooth (#28) had no restoration.
figre 1 : The tooth structure is at the bone level.
To save the tooth, bone needed to be removed (crown-lengthening) in order to gain enough root structure to fabricate a properly fitting crown. Weighing the many treatment steps and risks necessary to save this tooth – removing the post to retreat the root canal or performing a root-end surgery known as an apicoectomy, removing bone, and fabricating a restoration that has an unfavorable crown-to-root ratio, it was decided to extract the tooth and insert a dental implant.
Figure 2. Tooth removed.
Figure 2 demonstrates the tooth removed and a direction indicator to help determine the implant placement. The osteotomy site was prepared and a NobelBiocare Active implant inserted into the site (Fig 3).
Figure 3. Implant in place.
In this case, it was determined that the best treatment for a 25 year-old patient was not engage in the multiple risks to save the tooth that would leave the patient the patient with a compromised tooth. This treatment choice resulted in preserving bone, not damaging the adjacent teeth by making a bridge, and being able to insert a dental implant at the time the tooth was extracted in order to provide the most predictable and lasting treatment for a severely compromised tooth.
No comments:
Post a Comment